It’s Complicated (Ok, you’ve heard that before, but maybe not for this topic – billboards.)
April 15, 2021 by admin
Policy/Legislative
This article does not necessarily reflect the attitudes or opinions of APAUT or the APAUT Executive Committee.
This year’s Legislative Session was memorable for a lot of reasons. One reason was the Outdoor Advertising Industry, was unsuccessful in getting another State Law change that would have allowed any existing billboard to be changed over into an electronic billboard. Thanks to the League, Scenic Utah, numerous cities, and the APA Legislative Committee for winning a battle up there on the Hill. BUT, the war is not over!
Maybe billboards would be ok in some places, but my local example of 33rd South with its’ myriad of billboards in all shapes and sizes (including the 660 square footers), would be even more of a visual nightmare, with lighting projecting into neighborhoods and our not so dark skies getting increasingly brighter.
What’s a planner to do? First let’s be abundantly aware of the “contributions” that the billboard companies make to our local official’s campaigns as well as potential legislators. The conversation starts with us being many steps behind – but that is a reality, face it. It also is fraught with ethical issues for your community leadership and you. Can you even raise this issue without getting yourself in hot water? Very awkward for you to suggest changes, when you know your bosses are getting significant campaign contributions. You might be able to avoid that, by fostering the opportunity to let your planning commissioners carry the torch – let them propose needed changes!
Second, there are legal arguments that the Outdoor Industry is making that could be a problem. Content based discrimination. Is the only distinction between on-premise and off-premise signs, what is being advertised? To determine that, do you have to read the sign? If so, then that distinction we make may be in trouble. Yet, I am not sure if that trouble, keeping that distinction, is helpful or not. No distinction between on and off-premise signs could actually provide more control of their proliferation. Billboards are really just off-site pole signs.
Third, should we consider some universal changes to our sign ordinances? Many communities set pole sign size by the frontage that the use (or uses) occupy and therefore the number allowed on a property. Many communities set a size limit. Many have setback requirements based on height, and a limit for on-premise heights (but offer a different height for billboards). If you allow billboards, why do you treat them differently? Why shouldn’t an off-premise sign have the same regulations as an on-premise pole sign? What is the reason that we have traditionally made that distinction?
Fourth, what about the electronic, changing copy issue? Should we be eliminating all electronic signs because billboards might be successful someday in getting “equal” treatment? Pretty sure a few other sign companies would have fits with that proposal! Electronic signs are most likely the way of the future. Maybe there is some room for allowing electronic signs, if they meet certain standards – like a large property size, setbacks, or a certain amount of frontage. Yet, the billboard company’s proposal, I think, was that if you allow electronic signs anywhere in your community then they get to transform their existing boards and any new ones too.
Let’s not wait and hope that we can prevail again next year, when we know that the track record for the Outdoor Sign Industry has been so successful in the past. They have THE MOST supportive and extensive State Laws in their pocket already. Changing copy billboards have got to be incredibly profitable for them in the long run and profit is an amazing motivator.
Now is the time to take a second look at what you have in your sign ordinance. The content-based court case provides a means of starting this discussion. Consult with your City/County/Town Attorney. Does that distinction between on and off premise need to stay? Should it stay in light of recent court cases? Are all your signs headed toward the electronic version? This does not need to be a huge comprehensive overhaul. Consider just dropping the separate billboard distinction, re-evaluate your pole signs for locations, numbers, sizes, and get the changes made. Even if you don’t allow billboards now, that distinction may not hold up in the future, if the content-based issue is raised.
Doing nothing, isn’t a good option – this issue will be back and more issues will be raised at the Legislature – you can count on that!
John Janson AICP
Recent News
- Art as Daily Experience in Ogden’s Nine Rails Creative District
- Award Spotlight: Salt Lake City Reimagines Nature
- LET’S TALK! AND TALK. AND TALK SOME MORE…
- A Minnesota Judge Throws the Book at Immoral Tax Assessments
- The Great Rebalance
- To Fully Observe, We Need to Walk
- Study reveals that Utah housing prices have increased 200% in two decades
- DOUBLE WHAMMY
- The Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman
- Gov. Cox hails ‘generational’ effort in Utah’s water law history
- Clamor is King
- Utah Is Building a ’15-Minute City’ From Scratch
- Quality of Life – A Dishonest Approach to Change in Neighborhood Character
- Changing the Rules of Zoning
- Growth & Change In the West: 2022 RMLUI Conference Recap
- Vernacular Is Beautiful—If We Would Just Allow It
- APAUT Spring Conference Follow-up and Pictures
- To Airbnb or Not to Airbnb
- The Costs of Wide Streets in the U.S.
- APAUT President’s Message – March 2022
- How should we decide the fate of Utah Lake?
- How the Utah Legislature continues to usurp power from city and county government
- What to know about residential care facilities in your neighborhood
- University of Utah Professor Named the 3rd Most Cited Planning Faculty in the World
- TWO BIG BILLS OUT
- Examining the Impact of London’s Mandatory Inclusionary Housing
- May We all Grow Together: Cultivating Support for Utah’s Emerging Planners
- A Commitment to Change
- Okay Boomer
- APAUT Book Discussion: Evicted by Matthew Desmond
- Economic Development After the Rise of Telework
- Follow the 2022 Legislative Session
- After the Bennett Freeze: Planning Within the Navajo Nation
- Flexible Zoning for the New Economy
- Lead and Inspire with Purpose: AICP Code of Ethics Update
- Janet Quinney Lawson – Institute for Land, Water & Air
- Emerging Planners Survey
- Plan to restore Utah Lake met with resistance from Utah County conservation groups
- New Murray projects and guidelines move forward as moratorium ends
- From the Office of Dodge, Wiggle, Hack, Shrug & DeCamp, LLC
- Land Use Training
- Paul Allred: Career Reflections & Valuable Advice – Part 3
- Cache Summit 2021
- WAVE HIKING PERMIT CHANGES ON THE WAY
- Paul Allred: Career Reflections & Valuable Advice (Part 2)
- Paul Allred: Career Reflections & Valuable Advice
- UDOT seeks public input on rural Utah transportation plans
- Electric Vehicles Are on the Rise. Is Your Community Ready?
- Call for Award Nominations
- Fifteen-Minute City
- Remember Olympia Hills?
- The Mountain Lions: these nine cities boomed in the COVID era
- AS PLANNERS, WHY DO WE DO WHAT WE DO, AND WHY ARE WE DOING IT?
- Andrea Garfinkel-Castro, doctoral candidate, “Unpacks” Latino Urbanism
- 11 Ways To Excel Ethically At Every Level
- Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD): core principles
- A Tale of Two Walks: Part 2
- Heat, Health & Equity: The Effects of High Temperatures on Health, and Ways to Mitigate Heat in Our City
- Help Shape Equity Planning Policy
- DO CITIES HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO BAN FIREWORKS?
- Air Quality Is Better In Utah Today Than Ten Years Ago, But…
- Layton council adopts water-saving landscaping requirements for most new development
- CAREFUL WHOM YOU CALL A NIMBY
- Considering A National Infrastructure Bank
- HEALTHY UTAH COMMUNITY
- Breaking Down Silos: The Inception of the Utah Rural Coordinating Council
- MAG Transit Studies
- Effective Public Engagement Requires a Lot More Than a Public Hearing
- Is Remote Work Here to Stay?
- SENSITIVE LANDS PLANNING: PROTECTING PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE FOR GENERATIONS TO COME
- Bond Ratings are for Investors (Not Taxpayers)
- It’s Complicated (Ok, you’ve heard that before, but maybe not for this topic – billboards.)
- The Color of Law APAUT Online Book Discussion
- The American Jobs Plan Will Make Our Infrastructure Crisis Worse
- President’s Infrastructure Proposal Includes Addressing Housing Affordability
- We Cannot Plan from Our Desks
- Rep. Curtis, Sen. Romney introduce bill to advance the Bonneville Shoreline Trail
- Utah could lose out on billions in federal funding for passenger rail
- The Cure for the Wasatch Front’s Housing Crisis: More Affordable Homes Between North Salt Lake and Lehi
- Ambassador Program Update
- Local Needs Among Utah’s Multicultural Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Campus Mobility Hub Study – APAUT Award Winner
- Does Building New Housing Reduce Overall Housing Costs?
- Layton Forward – Layton City’s Comprehensive General Plan Update
- Spring Conference Postponed, Book Club, President’s Message
- Presidents Message
- Lehi Connectivity Standards – A Stronger Urban Fabric
- Housing First; Cars Last
- UDOT Bike Infrastructure Data Collection Project
- The Great Horizon Year of 2020
- Density is a Loaded Term
- New Study on Housing Affordability Focuses on Local Land Use Practices
- There is no such thing as ‘smart sprawl’
- Legislative Interim Committee – What You Need To Know
- A bipartisan opportunity to rebuild American infrastructure
- Zoning laws aren’t the only things hindering Utah’s housing market
- Congratulations to the APAUT 2020 Award Winners
- State and Local Governments Must Further Address Housing Affordability
- The Status of Women Leaders in Government – Utah Cities and Towns
- We have to do something about Utah’s housing crisis
- What the Wasatch Front needs is more basement apartments
- Cities Don’t Need High-Rises to Become Affordable
- Away from the bustle: Covid-19 and the end of commuterland
- The Color of Law: A Book Review
- (Contract) Zoning by Agreement in Utah
- Zoning Reform Is Not Leftism
- “The Great Localization” COVID-19 and Opportunities for Communities
- Missing Middle Housing: Thinking Big and Building Small to Respond to Today’s Housing Crisis
- Zoning Reform – English Style
- 3 Stories Show the Flip Side Of Zoning Reform
- APAUT Call to Action
- The Politics of Housing Affordability
- Zoning, Affordability, and COVID-19
- Where do we go NOW!? – President’s Message
- An Interview With Ashley Cleveland, MCMP
- The Importance of Sense of Place in our Communities
- An Answer to the Suburban Growth Dilemma
- Homeless to Housed Fall 2019
- A New Initiative: Children’s Walks
- Awards Spotlight: Water Quality Planning Toolkit for Utah Communities
- All About Storm Drain Utility Fees – Video