In reading this document, I am very happy to see repeated consideration of resident populations who fall below 60-80% AMI and recognition that the housing crisis impacts Utahns who are rent-burdened at an equal or greater intensity as what prospective homeowners might feel. That said, it does seem like many of the goals to increase the housing supply for homeowners are more specific than goals and objectives for alleviating cost or zoning burdens for tenants and potential LIHTC developers. It would be great if the total list of tactics was made public to stakeholders and a discussion of HOW that list will be curated for Phase II. I’m also wondering if additional maps could be provided that show regional differentiation in metrics.</p>
